Back to list
This article was auto-translated.View original (中文)
Tech1mo ago

Trump Praises Tim Cook and Warns Companies Seeking Tariff Refunds

U.S. President Trump recently praised outgoing Apple CEO Tim Cook in media interviews and on social media, while also issuing a veiled warning to companies considering seeking refunds for illegally imposed tariffs.

Trump Praises Tim Cook and Warns Companies Seeking Tariff Refunds

With his administration ruled to have illegally imposed tariffs on U.S. companies and forced to initiate a refund program, observers have noted that Apple has not yet applied for related refunds. Apple has not publicly commented on this, but when asked if Apple chose not to apply for a refund to avoid offending the President, Trump gave a rather suggestive response. In an interview with CNBC, he said it would be “very smart” if Apple didn’t seek a refund of the tariffs, stating he was “deeply honored” by the idea and emphasizing that he “would remember them” if Apple didn’t request a refund. Amidst the ambiguity, Trump also diverted the conversation to his dissatisfaction with the Supreme Court. However, his underlying message was clear: he believes companies should not seek to recover the money, and he will “remember” those that do not request refunds, as well as those that choose to apply.

Meanwhile, Trump discussed Cook’s departure as CEO on his own social media platform, Truth Social, and recalled his interactions with Cook in his usual exaggerated tone. He claimed to be impressed by the time “the head of Apple called to ‘kiss my ass.’” Trump wrote that during his five years as president, he gave “Tim” three to five “BIG HELPS.” According to his description, Cook would call for help solving problems, and he would step in when he thought Cook was “right,” resolving the issues “quickly and effectively” and “without spending a penny on those expensive consultants who cost millions of dollars and sometimes get things done, and sometimes don’t.”

Notably, Trump did not mention reports that he imposed additional tariffs on Apple because Cook refused an invitation, but instead chose to portray Cook as a corporate leader with a “career almost unparalleled.” He bluntly wrote at the end, “Simply put, Tim Cook is an incredible guy!!!” Regarding his alleged multiple “helps,” the text only vaguely mentioned solving a “rather tricky problem that only I, as President, could solve” for Cook. Outside observers widely speculate this was closely related to tariff issues. According to previous reports, Trump did indeed use tariff exemptions in 2025 to secure significant “relief” for Apple within its own-led tariff system.

Cook himself has not publicly responded to Trump’s high-profile “memoir-style” statements. He has repeatedly stated in the past that the Trump administration was willing to discuss relevant policies. Cook maintained a similar communication posture during the Obama and Biden administrations, but it was only during Trump’s term that he specially commissioned a gold glass commemorative plaque to show “gratitude.” Longtime observers view the interaction between Cook and Trump as controversial. On the one hand, it is seen by some as a company bowing to authoritarian gestures; on the other hand, others believe Cook was strategically “appeasing” the President in order to allow Apple to avoid the direct impact of policy retaliation as much as possible.

Analysts point out that, from the practical results, Apple has successfully maintained the company’s culture and initiatives related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) under Trump’s rule and the policy aftermath, without facing the same level of political and adjustment pressure as other Silicon Valley companies. Under the tariff system previously ruled illegal, Apple also significantly reduced potential losses, although the company still needs to bear additional costs of billions of dollars for the 2025 holiday quarter. As Cook officially steps down as CEO and becomes Apple’s Executive Chairman, observers widely believe that history will re-examine how he handled relations with the White House during the Trump era, and whether these choices brought more benefits or left more controversy for Apple.